The Alberta and federal governments say they will work together to understand what happened around public notifications of toxic seepage at an oilsands tailings pond. An oil worker holds raw oilsands near Fort McMurray, Alta., on July 9, 2008. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh

Federal and Alberta governments to study oilsands tailings leak communication

The Alberta and federal governments say they will work together to understand what happened around a nine-month delay in notifying the public about toxic seepage from an oilsands tailings pond.

“(Alberta Environment) Minister (Sonya) Savage and (federal Environment) Minister (Steven) Guilbeault reiterated a dual commitment to review information exchange processes and committed to maintaining open communication channels with Indigenous communities in the area with updates on water sampling and other monitoring results,” said a news release Wednesday from the Alberta government.

The release contained no direct quotes from Savage. Her office did not respond to a request for comment.

“Minister Guilbeault underlined that Imperial Oil’s own stated failures of communication were unacceptable and have raised broader concerns regarding the efficacy of (Alberta’s) existing notification systems,” said Kaitlin Power, Guilbeault’s spokeswoman.

Tuesday evening, Savage and Guilbeault discussed seepage and a leak from Imperial Oil’s Kearl oilsands mine about 70 kilometres north of Fort McMurray, Alta.

The seepage was discovered in May, but neither politician was told about it until nine months later. They learned of it from an environmental protection order issued by the Alberta Energy Regulator after a second release of 5.3 million litres of oilsands wastewater at Kearl from a catchment pond.

Area First Nations have also said they were not updated after initial notification of discoloured water found on the site.

Power said Ottawa also wants to see a federal-provincial-Indigenous working group, with participation from the oil companies, to address the immediate concerns around the Kearl releases “to restore trust and give transparency.”

Details on that group are expected soon.

Savage has repeatedly promised to get to the bottom of how it took so long for news of the significant leaks to be released.

“It’s an unfortunate incident that happened at Kearl, and I think we need to learn from it and do better,” Savage told a legislature committee on March 9.

“I think there are probably some gaps that need to be looked at and processes fixed and improved.”

However, under questioning from New Democrat environment critic Marlin Schmidt, Savage refused to provide any details of how that would happen.

Schmidt asked Savage for answers on the scope of the investigation into the releases, what its objective is, when it might be expected to report and what the basis is for the government’s repeated assurances that no wildlife or waterways were affected.

“I think the general public wants to know at least what’s going on,” he said.

Savage said she couldn’t say anything for fear of affecting the regulator’s investigation.

“I can’t comment on an ongoing investigation and compliance matter,” she said.

Wednesday’s news release said Alberta Environment and Protected Areas has sent officials to the site to conduct independent water sampling, in addition to monitoring already in place.

Environment Canada, which has said the released tailings are harmful to fish, also has inspectors on the site.

“Environment and Climate Change Canada will be closely engaged with the Alberta Energy Regulator to review Imperial Oil’s remedial action plan to ensure it complies with the Fisheries Act,” Power said in an email.